Every now and then, reading outside of one's favorite genres or comfort zone can be a very good idea. I say this for at least two reasons: 1. it is always good to see what other people like to read, in a "can't we all get along" sort of way; and 2. It makes you that much gladder to get back to your preferred type of reading.
Rarely had I felt so glad to get back to nonfiction than after forcing myself through Lee Child's thriller Killing Floor, the first in his popular Jack Reacher series. Actually, "forcing through" is the wrong phrase. I did read the whole thing, and I raced through it, which is what you're supposed to do with thrillers. More on that later.
One reason it was not for me? Reacher is ex-military. I am to the point where I can't read anything with remotely military characters. Even ex-military characters. It makes me too sad to think of all these servicepeople out there, moving from base to base and raising children feeling no ties to and no particular fondness for anyplace. Not to mention growing up and continuing the lifestyle themselves. It is close-minded of me, and probably wrong, and there you have it. Not to mention, how in the hell could someone as "lone wolf" as this character is made out to be have managed to stay in the military so long?
I'm still forming my thoughts on this one, so I'll end it there for today. I just thought the ex-military thing was an interesting stumbling block, and a good reminder that even when a book is written serviceably well (the writing here is roughly one thousand times better than that of James Patterson), you just never know what's going to be a deal-breaker in a particular book, for any particular reader. Doesn't make it a bad book. Maybe just not right for readers with close-minded hang-ups about the military. And really, how could anyone predict that?*
More tomorrow. I know, you're all just on the edges of your seats, aren't you?
*I throw this out there because a lot of times librarians, bookstore staff, and anyone who suggests books to readers takes it personally when someone doesn't love a book the way we think they should. It's not personal. It's proof that reading is a mystery, and people are a mystery. And a little mystery is necessary in life, let's face it.
Too bad you didn't like it, but you can never can tell with novels. The lone wolf thing in the military is definitely a plot issue.
Posted by: Tripp | 30 July 2008 at 10:20 AM
That is an excellent point to remember about people not liking the books you like, sometimes I feel offended when others don't like my recommendations, but your advice is perfect not everyone come to the book with the same experience. Sage advice about fiction from the non-fiction guru herself.
Posted by: katharine | 30 July 2008 at 11:21 AM
Tripp,
Nope, you never can tell. Part of the glory of reading, really. On the bright side, I feel like I can cross off a whole series now--how efficient!--I don't think I'll have to read any more Jack Reacher novels.
I seem to remember reading other books that featured "lone wolf" characters that were once associated with the military. I never could figure that out.
Katharine,
Yup, you've got to keep it in mind. The lovely thing is that if you know and trust certain book suggesters, you can keep reading what they suggest even if they don't bat a 1000. That's just how things go--you can never tell what mood a reader is going to be in. Take you, and the Laundress, for instance. I can't say I've wholeheartedly loved everything both of you have suggested, but I've never been bored, and I'll always come back for more. Which reminds me: what're you reading these days? Anything good? I could go for a "Katharine Pick."
Posted by: Citizen Reader | 30 July 2008 at 03:04 PM
Even the title would have been enough to keep me away. Yes, I too
am tired of all the military hoop-la in not only books but other media. What got this country in trouble is the use and cost of military power. Now it seems that being a gun-ho person on military might makes you a patriotic citizen that wears an American flag in your lapel (notice it's the military men who mostly wear this pin!).
Your blog reviews are very enlightening to those of us that are book addicts. Glad I discovered you.
Posted by: barbara | 30 July 2008 at 06:41 PM
Since I have to begin with the first book in a series or I won't read anything from it, I read this one, too. I know when I read it I enjoyed it, but I can't remember anything from it. I like genre fiction so it's not that, but sometimes with a series I have to get to know the characters, so I should have read the second one immediately after I read Killing Floor. You make a good point about the loner in the military, but when I'm reading fiction, I can believe anything if it makes some kind of sense to me. I'm glad you gave the book a try.
Have you read Straight Man by Russo yet?
Posted by: Venta | 30 July 2008 at 08:36 PM
Barbara,
Ha! (Re: the title.) That's exactly what my sister said when she saw this book lying on the table ("how can you read something with a title like this?") And then I suggested it to Mr. CR and he also opined that he's not really into books with all the violence. I am blessed to know such nonviolent souls, I think.
Yes, the military. Nothing scares me more than the idea of a. being broken down and rebuilt as part of an obedient unit, and b. having to obey orders with which I fundamentally disagree. AS the military seems rich in both those things, you can see why I've got to stay largely away from the military fiction. I could deal with the flag pins, but I do not believe it is unpatriotic to say that I wish, as I do, that the use of the military would be much more of a last resort than it currently is.
I'm glad to be discovered! Thanks for popping in and let's hear it for the book addicts.
Posted by: Citizen Reader | 30 July 2008 at 08:56 PM
Venta!
Yes, oftentimes I like the genre fiction, so I thought, why not? Your point about the characters is interesting--perhaps I didn't feel like Jack Reacher, who I sense may be the only recurring character, was enough of a character to sustain my interest. I often like a good recurring relationship as well, I find--Poirot had his Hastings, Spenser had his Hawk, etc.
Oh, Russo! So funny you should ask. I had a hankering for him the other day while I was at the library, but all they had was "Nobody's Fool," so that's what I got. Will that one count?
Posted by: Citizen Reader | 30 July 2008 at 08:59 PM