Mary Roach is known for her accessible and, at times, even quite humorous science writing--she made a big splash with her first title, Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers, and she's been quite popular ever since.
I really enjoy accessible science writing (frankly, science has to be made accessible if I want a chance in hell of even vaguely understanding it) and I find it just plain takes a good writer to make science (and most nonfiction, really) understandable, so these types of "popular" science books are usually very good reads.* Sadly, though, I wasn't all that turned on by Roach's previous two titles, Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife and Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex. But I was very, very pleased with her latest, Packing for Mars: The Curious Science of Life in the Void.
Space exploration and travel to the moon is one of those subjects I never seek out consciously, but which I often enjoy reading about serendipitously. (One of my favorite books ever to index was In the Shadow of the Moon, about the evolution of the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs) I never would have picked up Roach's book based on its subject, but I blew threw it in a couple of dedicated nights of wee-small-hours reading, and thoroughly enjoyed it.
I didn't bookmark anything for quoting; Roach's style is best taken as a whole. And yes, she did put in the obligatory chapter about sexual intercourse and weightlessness, but I'll tell you what the really interesting chapter was: how NASA went about trying to solve the problem of astronaut, ahem, elimination. And I don't mean being cut from the program. I mean the problem of trying to poo in (early in the program) plastic baggies or (later in the program) a toilet that could handle waste without letting fecal matter out to circulate through the cabin. Now THAT was the money chapter, in my opinion.
*I realize, in a funky ironic twist, that this sentence itself is barely understandable. See? Good writing is hard!
When I saw this book come into the library, I had to fight another coworker for it. Sadly, he won. He wanted it for the science, I wanted it for the author.
I really enjoyed Stiff. I enjoyed Spook, and I didn't finished Bonk (after awhile, the novelty of the subject wore off and I was just done).
I hope that Packing for Mars doesn't follow the downward relationship I have had with her books. I really like popular science books so my fingers are crossed.
Posted by: Sarah L.. | 13 September 2010 at 12:44 PM
This restored my faith in Mary Roach. Stiff really engrossed me, but Spook and Bonk didn't.
I liked the poop parts. I also was tickled by the different tests countries would set for their potential astronauts - all those paper cranes!
Posted by: Robin | 13 September 2010 at 08:05 PM
You weren't turned on by Bonk. LOL
Posted by: bybee | 14 September 2010 at 08:39 AM
Oh good, since I enjoyed Stiff but loathed Spook and had a suspicious I'd feel similarly about Bonk. So, on to the TBR list it goes! Still, she's not my fave science author.
Posted by: Eva | 14 September 2010 at 09:32 PM
Just started this one tonight. Amazingly I have not read her before, but she is really quite good.
Posted by: Tripp | 15 September 2010 at 09:43 PM