And I'm giving it to: Men Are Not Cost-Effective, by June Stephenson.
Now that's an eye-grabbing title, admit it. Sometimes when I'm searching for other titles in my library catalog, I scan the other titles that come up in the alphabetical list, which is how I found this title. So I just had to order it.
I know. I have the nerdiest bad habits EVER. I also spend a lot of time on the Internet, watching videos I shouldn't...of Jane Austen adaptations. That's right. It's porn for girls, and I'm addicted.
But, I digress. Now, from Men Are Not Cost-Effective. Check this out:
"Of the first-timers in state prisons, 73 percent of the males are charged with committing violent crimes, compared with 7 percent of the females. Of those who had prior violent crime convictions, 98 percent of the males are returned to jail for committing another violent crime after being released, compared with 2 percent of the females." (p. 8.)
"The best case for making the point that men are not cost-effective is found in the group of almost entirely male criminals who are now costing US taxpayers an anticipated half trillion dollars. These men are involved in the worst financial scandal* in the history of the United States. Men fraudulently and premeditatively, or at the very least greedily, siphoned off savings and loan depositors' money to their own advantage, knowing that the government, or more precisely the American taxpayers, would make good on their crimes." (p. 126.)
"A consistent element in most rape is the lack of concern for the victim. As a consequence, the most difficult task in rape counseling treatment centers is to get rapists to develop a sense of empathy. This is almost impossible for men who are devoid of emotions other than anger or frustration." (p. 209.)
June, God love her, goes on to suggest adding a "user's fee" of $100 on men's tax returns (since men are using the criminal justice system almost exclusively). She also points out, succinctly, that "if guns made us safer, the US would be the safest country in the world."
The pub date on the book is 1995, so I would take all those statistics with a grain of salt. But I like June's spirit. How's 'bout it, boys? Anyone up for putting $100 in the kitty voluntarily? Mr. Citizen Reader probably wouldn't be in to it, but I could just start taking the money out of his wallet if it's all for the greater good.
*In our current era of government and financial scandal, doesn't the Savings and Loan scandal seem almost quaint?